In a recent game between the New York Rangers and the New York Islanders, tensions ran high as Rangers coach Peter Laviolette criticized the Islanders’ players for what he described as “vicious” hits. One particular hit that sparked controversy occurred with 11:09 left in the third period when Rangers center Mika Zibanejad collided with Islanders defenseman Adam Pelech at center ice. The impact caused Zibanejad to fall flat on the ice, requiring attention from the Rangers’ training staff. Zibanejad was forced to leave the game and did not return to the ice for the remainder of the period. Despite this, he did make a brief return to the Rangers’ bench towards the end of the game, as reported by Laviolette.
Laviolette went on record saying, “He came back at the end from that vicious hit. He came back. That vicious shoulder, elbow to the head. Watch it.” The coach expressed his belief that the hit was intentional rather than a mere accidental collision. When questioned about the nature of the collision, Laviolette firmly stated, “I do.”
In contrast to Laviolette’s accusations, Islanders coach Patrick Roy adamantly defended his players, claiming that the collision was purely accidental. Roy emphasized that the referee had a clear view of the incident and confirmed that it was not an intentional act on behalf of the Islanders. He went on to express his surprise and disappointment over the continued discussion regarding the hit, stating, “There’s no doubt in my mind. I don’t know why we’re talking about this, quite honestly. I’m a little surprised. It’s clear in my mind that it was accidental.”
Roy also addressed Laviolette’s comments, attributing them to frustration and stating, “sometimes, frustration makes you say things.”
The controversy did not end with the initial hit on Zibanejad, as another incident occurred later in the third period. Forward Vincent Trocheck of the Rangers was hit from behind into the end boards by Islanders defenseman Noah Dobson. Laviolette once again condemned the hit, describing it as “vicious” and expressing his frustration over the physicality of the game. Despite the challenges faced by the Rangers, Laviolette commended his players for their resilience and determination until the final buzzer.
Roy offered a different perspective on the hit, claiming that the puck was in the air at the time of contact and that Trocheck should have anticipated the hit. He defended Dobson’s actions, stating that the intention was not to harm but to make a side-on impact.
In terms of gameplay, the Rangers capitalized on their power play opportunities, scoring twice with three power plays, while the Islanders had two power plays but failed to score. The victory for the Islanders secured them 87 points in 78 games, maintaining their position two points ahead of the Washington Capitals in the Metro Division.
Overall, the game between the New York Rangers and the New York Islanders was marked by intense physicality and controversial hits, sparking debate and differing opinions from both coaches involved.
Leave a Reply