The recent meeting between the representatives of the Athletics’ ownership and officials from Oakland and Alameda County did not result in a resolution regarding the team’s future. Oakland’s offer to keep the team in the Coliseum at least through the 2027 season was described as “fair and reasonable” by the office of Oakland Mayor Sheng Thao. However, it seems that the Athletics are exploring other options, as they are expected to meet with Sacramento officials to hear a proposal for the team’s temporary home for a minimum of three seasons starting next year. This move of pitting two Northern California cities against each other seems reminiscent of the A’s controversial “Parallel Paths” plan from last April.
Sacramento, led by the efforts of Vivek Ranadive, owner of the Sacramento Kings, sees the potential housing of the A’s as a major milestone in the city’s journey to becoming a full-fledged big league city. Ranadive, a close friend of A’s owner John Fisher, believes that sharing Sutter Health Park with the A’s will position Sacramento as the team’s permanent home in case the Las Vegas relocation falls through. The initial offer from Sacramento for a five-year lease with an opt-out after three seasons presents an interesting alternative to the Athletics.
Financial Implications and Roadblocks
Any move for the Athletics, whether to Sacramento or elsewhere, will have financial ramifications. The team’s regional television contract with NBC Sports Bay Area, which currently amounts to $67 million per year, will be affected by any relocation. Even a move within Northern California would necessitate renegotiating this contract. Furthermore, Oakland’s requirement for the A’s to sell their 50% stake in the Coliseum property to a local developer as part of the proposal adds another layer of complexity to the situation. The A’s have expressed a willingness to comply with this request, but it remains to be seen how this will impact their plans.
The Athletics’ goal of moving to a new ballpark in Las Vegas for the 2028 season hinges on a smooth construction process in the parking lot of the Tropicana Casino and Resort. The current estimate assumes that everything will proceed according to plan, but any delays or complications could jeopardize this timeline. The team’s statement indicating that they are “far apart on the terms needed to agree on an extension” with Oakland suggests that there are significant hurdles that need to be overcome for a resolution to be reached. The looming $30 million payment due by May 14 adds urgency to the situation and underscores the time-sensitive nature of the decision facing the Athletics’ ownership.
The negotiations and offers on the table present a complex web of possibilities for the Athletics’ ownership. The decision regarding the team’s future home will have far-reaching implications both financially and logistically. As the talks with Oakland, Sacramento, and potentially other cities continue, it remains to be seen how the Athletics will navigate this critical juncture in their history.
Leave a Reply